<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Miracle</title>
	<link>http://aparna-a.com/2008/09/26/miracle/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 20:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Aparna</title>
		<link>http://aparna-a.com/2008/09/26/miracle/#comment-85524</link>
		<author>Aparna</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://aparna-a.com/2008/09/26/miracle/#comment-85524</guid>
		<description>Ganesh,
Welcome to my blog! I like all the books of Erich Segal. 

Sathej,
Oh I see</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ganesh,<br />
Welcome to my blog! I like all the books of Erich Segal. </p>
<p>Sathej,<br />
Oh I see</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sathej</title>
		<link>http://aparna-a.com/2008/09/26/miracle/#comment-84975</link>
		<author>Sathej</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://aparna-a.com/2008/09/26/miracle/#comment-84975</guid>
		<description>Looks a very interesting read. 'Science cannot comprehend miracles' - well, I wouldn't quite agree with that - infact there seems to be an inherent contradiction. While the book agrees that medicine (science) is an eternal 'quest' for reality, the result of the quest cannot be pre-determined that it 'cannot' comprehend a miracle. It is still a contnuing quest and infact, miracles cease to be miracles once the explanation is found. Hence, both the domains - that of science and miracles continue to change eternally.

Of course, on another front, science cannot comprehend something that is much beyond its scope - i.e., art. But then the objective of science is reality while the object of art is not quite reality..

Sathej</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks a very interesting read. &#8216;Science cannot comprehend miracles&#8217; - well, I wouldn&#8217;t quite agree with that - infact there seems to be an inherent contradiction. While the book agrees that medicine (science) is an eternal &#8216;quest&#8217; for reality, the result of the quest cannot be pre-determined that it &#8216;cannot&#8217; comprehend a miracle. It is still a contnuing quest and infact, miracles cease to be miracles once the explanation is found. Hence, both the domains - that of science and miracles continue to change eternally.</p>
<p>Of course, on another front, science cannot comprehend something that is much beyond its scope - i.e., art. But then the objective of science is reality while the object of art is not quite reality..</p>
<p>Sathej</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ganesh</title>
		<link>http://aparna-a.com/2008/09/26/miracle/#comment-84947</link>
		<author>ganesh</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 07:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://aparna-a.com/2008/09/26/miracle/#comment-84947</guid>
		<description>hai am ganesh. i love erich segal too,but for LOVE STORY. its a good book. hope u enjoyed that too. i think alaipayuthe theme is taken from LOVE STORY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hai am ganesh. i love erich segal too,but for LOVE STORY. its a good book. hope u enjoyed that too. i think alaipayuthe theme is taken from LOVE STORY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

